Circulating Water Drag Reducer
Composite Chilled Water Drag Reduction Agent
Specifically developed for closed-loop chilled water systems. Combining drag reduction, anti-corrosion coating, and scale inhibition technologies, it effectively lowers energy consumption, improves heat exchange efficiency, extends equipment lifespan, and achieves overall system energy savings of approximately 15~34%.
3-in-1 Technical Mechanism
Drag Reduction
Utilizes polymer drag reduction technology (Toms Effect) to suppress turbulence, lower pipeline resistance, and reduce pump energy usage.
- Reduces pipe friction loss
- Lowers water pump power consumption
- Energy saving up to 10~60%
Coating Protection
Forms a nano-passivation protective layer to inhibit corrosion, reduce metal ion dissolution, and extend equipment lifespan.
- Corrosion resistance protection
- Reduces corrosion rate by ≥80%
- Extends equipment operational life
Scale Inhibition
Efficaciously chelates calcium and magnesium ions to prevent new scaling while gradually descaling existing deposits.
- Prevents scale formation at the source
- Improves heat exchange efficiency by 20~40%
- Maintains system cleanliness
Proven Results (Typical Case Study)
| Metric | Pre-Dosing | Post-Dosing | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall COP | 6.748 | 7.630 | +13.1% |
| Chilled Water Pump #1 Power Consumption | Baseline | — | -34.2% |
| Chilled Water Pump #2 Power Consumption | Baseline | — | -28.4% |
| Sector | Energy Savings | Payback Period |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics Manufacturing | 11~13% | ≥0.6 Years |
| Hospitals | 15~25% | 1.2~1.8 Years |
| Commercial Complexes | 12~20% | 1.0~1.5 Years |
ESMC 3 Major Energy Optimization Solutions Comparison Table
| Feature | High-Efficiency Equipment | AIoT System Design | Recommended Composite Drag Reduction Agent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Investment Scale | High (Millions) | Medium (Hundreds of Thousands) | Lowest |
| Payback Period | 3~5 Years | 2~3 Years | ≈ 1 Year |
| Installation Method | Requires Shutdown | System Commissioning | Online Dosing, ~1 Day |
| Action Mechanism | Power Source | Control Strategy | Fluid Physical Properties |
Before vs After Optimization
System Status Comparison
| Metric | ⚠ Before Optimization | ✓ After Optimization |
|---|---|---|
| Pipe Wall Condition | Scaling and corrosion; surface roughness up to 10x design specs | Protected by passivation film, maintaining long-term smooth condition |
| Flow Regime | Severe turbulence with high energy dissipation | Suppressed turbulence, leading to significantly lower friction loss |
| Heat Exchange Surface | High scale thermal resistance; K-value drops by 20%~40% | K-value restored to over 90% of original design capacity |
| Water Pump Operation | High-frequency, high-power inefficient operation | Operates at reduced frequency with lowered power consumption |
| Chiller COP | Degrades annually | Restored and stabilized at design efficiency levels |
Standard Implementation Process
System Audit (Free)
Water quality testing, system evaluation, establishing energy baseline.
Online Dosing
Dosed directly during active operation without stopping the system.
Performance Verification
Data monitoring and performance analysis on Day 3, 7, and 30.
Acceptance Report
Weather normalization, energy saving calculations, and automated report generation.